Presentations on Terraforming’s work, the state of memory culture, and the challenges of antisemitism in Serbia
Miško Stanišić delivered a presentation to VHEC staff about Terraforming’s work. Our hosts listened with great interest to Terraforming’s extensive experience in developing diverse teaching methodologies and pedagogical materials—from educational graphic novels to the use of artificial intelligence as an interface for engaging with testimonies.
They were particularly struck by the complexity of memory culture in Serbia, a society with a fragile democratic tradition still dominated by unprocessed traumas from the conflicts of the 1990s, while nationalism and politicization are the main catalysts shaping the presentation and understanding of history. As a result, distortion and misuse of history—including the Holocaust—are frequent both in official and institutional narratives. A lack of courage and political will to address controversial topics such as collaboration, one’s own crimes, manipulation of victim numbers, and blaming others—especially for day-to-day political propaganda—are key features of the vicious Balkan cycle of mutual fueling of nationalism and hatred.
We also spoke about our initiatives to present and implement IHRA standards and recommendations in Serbia, especially the recommendations on teaching and learning about the Holocaust and the genocide of the Roma, and we wish to develop cooperation with VHEC in this area as well. In the discussion that followed, colleagues from VHEC repeatedly emphasized that they were impressed by Terraforming’s commitment and results, especially given that we are a relatively small team operating under complex conditions.
Antisemitism in transition
Miško Stanišić delivered his second presentation at the Jewish Community Centre of Greater Vancouver (Jewish Community Centre of Greater Vancouver JCCGV), an institution of Vancouver’s Jewish community. The Jewish community in Vancouver numbers around 25,000, and around 35,000 in British Columbia, while approximately 400,000 Jews live across Canada, making up about 1% of Canada’s population. Miško’s lecture, titled “Antisemitism in Transition: Perspectives from Serbia and the Post-Conflict Balkans”, drew JCCGV board members, staff, and visitors to the Jewish Community Centre. Miško spoke about recognizing regional variations of contemporary antisemitism, the specific nature of this challenge in Southeast Europe, and why understanding regional specificities of antisemitism is also relevant in Canada. In that context, Serbia—which has undergone a dual transition, from communist to democratic governance and from armed conflict and violence to a post-conflict society—has not fully completed either of these processes.
In his presentation, Miško analyzed specific characteristics of Serbian society in the context of antisemitism, emphasizing that an authoritarian regime, lack of the rule of law, and the absence of media freedoms create an environment in which it is difficult to address hate speech institutionally. At the same time, the authorities use populist nationalism, the spread of fear, and the maintenance of a state of constant social paranoia as key tools—directly facilitating the development of conspiracy theories that are historically deeply connected to antisemitic patterns.
Also characteristic of Serbia is the phenomenon of denying the existence of antisemitism in our society, which is entirely nonsensical in any European context, since antisemitism is deeply woven into the core of European cultural identity. There is no European society—including Serbian society—in which antisemitism does not manifest; the only question is how much, in what ways, and to what extent this hatred is part of the mainstream or remains on the margins. This refusal to speak about antisemitism in Serbia has, on the one hand, led to contemporary incidents being deliberately ignored and minimized, while on the other hand it has meant that sustainable, long-term strategies to counter antisemitism are not being developed.
In Serbia today, antisemitism is growing particularly on the left, but antisemitism driven by nationalism and the ideas of the classic far right is also present. A particular problem is that, as a result of rising institutional pressure on civil society and academia, independent initiatives to map and understand antisemitism are being endangered—initiatives that could otherwise offer evidence-based recommendations to decision-makers. Miško also spoke about the ABC of Antisemitism handbook, the UP2US project, and the motivations that led to the founding of the Centre for Combating Antisemitism and Intolerance in Novi Sad.
After the lecture, there was a Q&A with the audience. Several participants noted that they were particularly struck by how many of the problems they recognized in their own environment as well, demonstrating the extent to which antisemitism is a global phenomenon that manifests in not-so-different ways in places that are geographically very far apart, such as British Columbia on Canada’s Pacific west coast and Serbia in Southeast Europe.